So, that got me thinking - how does this list compare to the three before it? You can see what I discovered in the table below:
Here are a few of my thoughts:- These average scores for each list are so close that it's virtually impossible to make a call. With a range of 85.9 to 86.4, a statistician would laugh me out of the room if I tried to say that, without a doubt, the 2009 Holiday list was far superior to the 2010 Summer list. It's too close for that kind of certainty.
- I was a little surprised by how consistent the overall average scores were. Makes me think that I may actually, kind of, sort of, maybe know what I'm doing (but who can say?) because the scores fall very much in line with how I think about most wines in the $8 - $20 range. Most of them are average for me and nothing more.
- It also makes me wonder if Whole Foods can actually find wines that may up the game for this price range. Despite my comments in the bullet above, I have tasted several wines in this price range that fare better than the 86'ish average - wines like Three Thieves "The Show" Cabernet Sauvignonw, Pascual Toso Malbec, Townshend Malbec - even though they are few and far between. But when you're a mass retailer like Whole Foods and you come out with a twice a year promotion that drives a heavy volume of sales, the question is whether or not it's even possible to find these better wines at the volume they need. I'm not sure, but my gut says no.
Now off to Walla Walla for the 2010 Wine Bloggers Conference...
Notes:
* There are three wines missing from the 2008 Holiday list and for the life of me, I cannot remember why.
** There is one wine missing from the 2009 Summer list because it was a Rose and I didn't give it a rating, as I am entirely incapable of giving a sensible rating to a Rose - none of them taste that good to me (except for maybe the Bandol Domaine Tempier).
Blog
Gadget

























