tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1592317587051634377.post1694730235274572164..comments2009-08-03T21:51:23.153-07:00Comments on RJ's Wine Blog: Michel Schlumberger WinesRJ's Wine Bloghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03698467945699347417noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1592317587051634377.post-62447787177653540712009-08-03T21:51:23.153-07:002009-08-03T21:51:23.153-07:00it's amazing to me the scores that ws gave the...it's amazing to me the scores that ws gave these guys. i thought their wines were some of the best of the weekend. and will definitely buy some and go visit again when i'm in dry creek. great winery, amazing wines and really gracious folks - cannot beat that.RJ's Wine Bloghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03698467945699347417noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1592317587051634377.post-31883211457623438852009-08-03T11:52:47.398-07:002009-08-03T11:52:47.398-07:00I love Michel Schlumberger. I've been a club m...I love Michel Schlumberger. I've been a club member for going on three years and try to make a point to visit on every trip. Not only is the wine fab, but the people are just great. The Pinot Blanc always tops my list of top white wines. I just reviewed the 08 the other day, which also links to my reviews of the 06 and 07. http://wannabewino.com/2009/07/16/a-repeat-winner/ The WS taster is clearly smoking something to have given the 06 an 80. Wow.Sonadorahttp://wannabewino.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1592317587051634377.post-57152186135036632172009-08-02T07:14:09.410-07:002009-08-02T07:14:09.410-07:00that's probably a better way of saying it. in...that's probably a better way of saying it. interesting to see such low scores on spectator. if you have a subscription, check it out.RJ's Wine Bloghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03698467945699347417noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1592317587051634377.post-58227848949326772732009-08-02T06:27:22.763-07:002009-08-02T06:27:22.763-07:00just a thought, but if I understand WS practices c...just a thought, but if I understand WS practices correctly, it is not that they did not rate the wine, but that it has not yet been tasted. And the reason it hasn't been tasted is likely that samples have not been sent.Rob Bralowhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07210894629687612702noreply@blogger.com